Do all browsers support WebP?

Yes. Chrome, Edge and Firefox have supported WebP for years, and Safari added support in version 14 (2020). Any browser released after 2021 renders WebP natively.

Will I lose quality converting JPG to WebP?

There is a tiny re-encoding pass, but at quality 80–85 the WebP is visually identical to the JPG while being roughly 30% smaller.

Can WebP store transparency?

Yes, WebP has an 8-bit alpha channel, but a JPG source has none — the WebP output will be opaque unless you edit alpha in later.

Is WebP good for print?

Rarely. Most print RIPs still expect TIFF or high-quality JPG. WebP is designed for screens.

How much smaller will my file be?

For photos, expect a 25–35% reduction at equal visible quality. Line art and flat graphics can shrink much more — sometimes 60–70%.

What quality should I pick?

80 for hero images, 75 for thumbnails, 90+ for anything that will be inspected closely. Below 60 the smart predictor still holds up but you may see softness.

Does WebP replace the need for a CDN?

No. A CDN reduces latency; WebP reduces bytes. Combined they are the classic Core Web Vitals fix.

Will Google index WebP images?

Yes. Googlebot has indexed WebP since 2014 and the format is preferred in the PageSpeed Insights image recommendations.

Convert JPG to WebP

WebP is Google's modern image format that typically produces 25–35% smaller files than JPG at the same perceived quality. It's supported by every modern browser and ideal for speeding up web pages.

Your files never leave your device. No upload. No sign-up.

Running locally

To convert JPG to WebP, drop a JPG above and adjust the quality slider. WebP typically produces files 25–35% smaller than JPG at the same visible quality, which is one of the easiest Core Web Vitals wins for a modern website. Chrome, Edge, Firefox, Safari (14+) and every current mobile browser render WebP natively — no fallback is required. The re-encode runs on your device using canvas.toBlob('image/webp', quality); nothing is uploaded. Because the JPG has already been compressed once, this is a second lossy pass — usually invisible at quality 80 or above, but worth converting from an original rather than a heavily compressed copy where possible. The remaining compatibility gaps are outside browsers: several email clients, older desktop software and a few content management systems still reject WebP, so keep a JPG fallback for anything that will be emailed or handed to a print workflow.

Drop a JPG here, or click to upload

Output: WebP

What happens when you convert JPG to WebP?

WebP is Google's image format built on the VP8 keyframe codec. Its lossy mode uses a smarter block predictor than JPEG, and its lossless mode uses a custom transform-based coder derived from WebP-Lossless. At quality 80 a WebP photo is visually indistinguishable from a quality-90 JPG while being roughly 30% smaller — that's why it dominates CDN pipelines like Cloudinary, Imgix and Netlify Images. WebP also supports alpha transparency and animation, but a JPG source contributes neither. Since Safari 14 (September 2020) WebP is supported on every major browser, and it is now the default output of iOS Screenshot and Android Chrome save-as.

Common mistakes and limitations when going from JPG to WebP

Older platforms are the main constraint: Internet Explorer, Safari 13 and earlier, Word 2016 and many legacy CMS uploaders reject WebP. If your audience overlaps with those, keep a JPG fallback. WebP is also not a lossless upgrade from JPG — you are re-encoding lossy data with a different lossy codec, so at very low quality settings you can see slight extra softness. For archival masters, keep the JPG. Finally, WebP metadata support is patchier than JPEG; EXIF and XMP survive some pipelines and not others.

Choosing the right settings for JPG to WebP

WebP at quality 80 usually matches JPG at quality 90 in perceived terms while producing a file 25 to 35 percent smaller. That is the whole reason to make this conversion, and it is why WebP became the default output format for most image pipelines. Because the source is already JPG, you are re-encoding lossy data into a different lossy format — generation loss applies. The practical consequence is that you should not convert a heavily compressed JPG and expect a clean result; the artefacts in the source are treated as image detail and faithfully preserved, sometimes at surprising cost in file size. Convert from the highest-quality JPG you have rather than from a web-optimised one. Browser support is no longer a meaningful constraint — every current browser reads WebP — but email clients and some desktop software still do not. If the image is destined for an email newsletter, a PowerPoint deck or an older content management system, test before committing. The usual production pattern is to serve WebP through a picture element with a JPG fallback, which keeps both audiences covered. Check fine gradients after converting. WebP's lossy mode occasionally produces slightly different banding behaviour to JPG in smooth sky and studio-backdrop areas, and that is the one place a nominally better format can look marginally worse. Keep the original JPG until you have checked the WebP in the context it will actually appear in. Re-encoding is one-way, and a source you have deleted cannot be re-converted at a higher quality later.

Questions8

JPG to WebP conversion FAQ

Do all browsers support WebP?: Yes. Chrome, Edge and Firefox have supported WebP for years, and Safari added support in version 14 (2020). Any browser released after 2021 renders WebP natively.
Will I lose quality converting JPG to WebP?: There is a tiny re-encoding pass, but at quality 80–85 the WebP is visually identical to the JPG while being roughly 30% smaller.
Can WebP store transparency?: Yes, WebP has an 8-bit alpha channel, but a JPG source has none — the WebP output will be opaque unless you edit alpha in later.
Is WebP good for print?: Rarely. Most print RIPs still expect TIFF or high-quality JPG. WebP is designed for screens.
How much smaller will my file be?: For photos, expect a 25–35% reduction at equal visible quality. Line art and flat graphics can shrink much more — sometimes 60–70%.
What quality should I pick?: 80 for hero images, 75 for thumbnails, 90+ for anything that will be inspected closely. Below 60 the smart predictor still holds up but you may see softness.
Does WebP replace the need for a CDN?: No. A CDN reduces latency; WebP reduces bytes. Combined they are the classic Core Web Vitals fix.
Will Google index WebP images?: Yes. Googlebot has indexed WebP since 2014 and the format is preferred in the PageSpeed Insights image recommendations.

JPG vs WebP at a glance

Property	JPG source	WebP output
Compression	Lossy DCT	Lossy VP8 (smarter block predictor)
File size at equal quality	Baseline	25–35% smaller
Transparency	No	Yes (unused from JPG)
Browser support	Universal	Chrome/Firefox/Edge/Safari 14+
Best used for	Universal compatibility	Modern web performance